Skip to main content

Trump Administration Live Updates: House Moves Ahead With President’s Policy Bill Amid G.O.P. Resistance

 

Trump Administration Live Updates: House Moves Ahead With President’s Policy Bill Amid G.O.P. Resistance

A vote allowing the bill to come up for debate indicated a breakthrough after Speaker Mike Johnson haggled with Republican holdouts into the early hours of Thursday.

Several men in suits and a police officer walk through a hallway.
Speaker Mike Johnson in the Capitol on Wednesday.Credit...Eric Lee for The New York Times

The House took its first step early Thursday toward a final vote on President Trump’s marquee domestic policy bill, after Republicans put down a revolt by conservative holdouts that had threatened to sink it.

After a day and night of paralysis on the House floor, and haggling and uncertainty in the Capitol, Speaker Mike Johnson scored a preliminary victory in his bid to overcome resistance within his party when the House voted to allow the bill to come up for debate. The 219-to-213 vote suggested he had won the backing of recalcitrant Republicans whose resistance had stalled the measure, though the House still had to take a final vote to approve it.

Facing tight margins in the House, he could afford only a handful of defections on the measure, which would slash taxes by a total of $4.5 trillion, increase funding for the military and border security, cut about $1 trillion from Medicaid and reduce food assistance for the poor.

Dysfunction reigned on the House floor into the wee hours of Thursday morning ahead of the vote, as a handful of Republicans opposed bringing up the measure and more withheld their votes altogether, sending Mr. Johnson grasping for a way to muscle through the sweeping legislation in the face of unified Democratic opposition.

Mr. Johnson had spent all day Wednesday at the Capitol cajoling holdouts while Mr. Trump summoned some of them to the White House to twist their arms. But by early Thursday morning, they had yet to lock down the votes to move forward, particularly among a bloc of fiscally conservative Republicans who were dismayed by the bill’s cost and demanding changes that could derail it altogether.

“What are the Republicans waiting for??? What are you trying to prove???” Mr. Trump, clearly unhappy with how the events of the night were unfolding, wrote in a post on his social media platform. “MAGA IS NOT HAPPY, AND IT’S COSTING YOU VOTES!!!”

Hours before dawn, some of the defectors said they had changed their minds and were ready to vote in favor of the bill, though the revolt reflected the deep divisions that have plagued its path through Congress for months. It was not clear what had persuaded them to change course, given the harsh denunciations of the bill that many of them have made in recent days.

The Senate’s version of the legislation, which passed that chamber by a single vote on Tuesday after a similarly intensive round of G.O.P. haggling, exacerbated those rifts. Fiscal conservatives were demanding even deeper cuts to rein in deficits, while lawmakers whose seats are at risk during next year’s midterm elections have resisted the biggest reductions to popular government programs including Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.

Members of the anti-spending faction, including in the vocal House Freedom Caucus, were furious at measures added by the Senate that increased the cost of the legislation and its effect on the national debt.

“The Senate doesn’t get to be the final say on everything. We’ve got to work this out,” said Representative Chip Roy of Texas, a member of the Freedom Caucus. On Wednesday morning, he said there were enough Republicans “right now” who wanted to reopen the bill and were willing to blow through the July 4 recess to do so, but the vote on Wednesday evening suggesting they would not insist on doing so. After threatening not to, Mr. Roy voted to bring up the bill.

More moderate Republicans, many of them anticipating difficult re-election campaigns in swing districts, object to the deeper Medicaid cuts approved by the Senate than those passed by the House in May.

Still, conservatives have repeatedly refused to back major legislation, only to fold under pressure from Mr. Trump. Wednesday night’s vote suggested they were preparing to do so again on the sweeping domestic policy bill.

Image
A man in business attire speaks at the foot of the steps of a building with white columns. Dozens of people stand behind him on the steps.
Democratic representatives assailed the Republican bill on the steps of the Capitol on Wednesday before raising a number of procedural roadblocks on the House floor.Credit...Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times

Democrats have raised a number of procedural roadblocks to register their opposition to the measure and slow its progress.

“When we say the Republican Party has turned into a cult, this is what we mean,” said Representative Seth Magaziner, Democrat of Rhode Island. “Our Republican colleagues are pushing a bill that would throw their constituents under the bus, a bill that flies in the face of everything they claim to stand for, all because Donald Trump wants a bill signing photo-op by the Fourth of July.”

Emboldened by the G.O.P. rift, Democrats have made a point to project a united front while they rail against the bill and ramp up pressure on vulnerable Republicans.

At a news conference on the House steps attended by a sizable portion of the Democratic caucus, Representative Katherine M. Clark of Massachusetts, the No. 2 House Democrat, called out Representative David Valadao of California, one of the most politically vulnerable Republicans. She questioned how he could back a bill that would slash Medicaid, a program that he has repeatedly voiced concern about, and on which many of his constituents depend.

Mr. Valadao has said he cannot support the level of Medicaid cuts included in the Senate measure. He voted to advance the bill.

Popular posts from this blog

Fiscal Tightening: Budget Cuts & Healthcare Rollbacks

  Fiscal Tightening: Budget Cuts & Healthcare Rollbacks In a bid to close a $ 12 billion deficit, Newsom enacted a $ 321 billion state budget featuring: Healthcare cuts for undocumented immigrants Paused pre-funding of retiree health (OPEB) debts worth over $ 700 million annually—risking long-term liabilities wsj.com +1 reuters.com +1 youtube.com +8 calmatters.org +8 calmatters.org +8 sfchronicle.com +6 en.wikipedia.org +6 timesofindia.indiatimes.com +6 calmatters.org +2 sfchronicle.com +2 timesofindia.indiatimes.com +2 A “poison pill” provision linking budget enactment to passage of CEQA reforms, prompting criticism over process transparency

New California Laws Effective 2025

          New California Laws Effective July , 2025 A wave of consumer-friendly and safety-driven legislation takes effect today: Minimum wage rises in San Francisco, Berkeley, Emeryville, and Fremont to nearly $ 20/hr (state base $16.50) SB 1144 mandates online marketplaces (e.g., Amazon) to flag suspected stolen goods to law enforcement Distracted‑driving is now banned even when using hand-held navigation AB 2202 requires Airbnb hosts to disclose all fees upfront—non-compliance carries up to $ 10,000 fines SB 729 expands insurance for IVF, benefiting LGBTQ+ individuals and single parents AB 2863 and other bills boost consumer transparency (e.g., recurring subscriptions, drink lids at bars) These measures aim to bolster consumer rights, transparency, and public safety across the state.

Short Information About Suspect Profile & Mental Health

  Suspect Profile & Mental Health Military Background Decker is a former Army survivalist—trained to endure rugged conditions people.com +3 people.com +3 nypost.com +3 . Mental Health & Financial Issues Court documents indicate he was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder , exhibited isolation and paranoia, and experienced housing instability —living in an RV and shelters, facing eviction and garnished wages people.com . Pre-Crime Behavior Days before the disappearances, Decker reportedly searched online for "how to move to Canada" and "jobs in Canada" people.com +4 people.com +4 en.wikipedia.org +4 .
Referral link